bookmark_borderbliss

Muse的MV中最喜欢的一个。半粒米在往下掉……

Everything about you is how I’d wanna be
Your freedom comes naturally
Everything about you resonates happiness
Now I won’t settle for less

Give me
All the peace and joy in your mind

Everything about you pains my envying
Your soul can’t hate anything
Everything about you is so easy to love
They’re watching you from above

Give me
All the peace and joy in your mind
I want the peace and joy in your mind

Give me
All the peace and joy in your mind

Everything about you resonates happiness
Now I won’t settle for less

Give me
all the peace and joy in your mind
I want the peace and joy in your mind

Give me the peace and joy in your mind

bookmark_borderStephen Fry – Dearest absurd child

今天上午看到这篇文章。读了第一段就感动到了不行。藏着吃好晚饭仔细地读了TT然后现在忍不住打破平时不开电脑的习惯上来把这个贴到自己博客上。

对于Stephen Fry这个神奇的人我所知甚少。我知道他是演员,他宣传GNU,他是DNA的好友(但是奇怪好像他们的工作上从来没有过交集?Last Chance to See不算~)

感动点我加粗标出来……TT

原文:http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/30/stephen-fry-letter-gay-rights

I hope you are well. I know you are not. As it happens you wrote in 1973 a letter to your future self and it is high time that your future self had the decency to write back. You declared in that letter (reproduced in your 1997 autobiography Moab Is My Washpot) that “everything I feel now as an adolescent is true”. You went on to affirm that if ever you dared in later life to repudiate, deny or mock your 16-year-old self it would be a lie, a traducing, treasonable lie, a crime against adolescence. “This is who I am,” you wrote. “Each day that passes I grow away from my true self. Every inch I take towards adulthood is a betrayal.”

Oh, lord love you, Stephen. How I admire your arrogance and rage and misery. How pure and righteous they are and how passionately storm-drenched was your adolescence. How filled with true feeling, fury, despair, joy, anxiety, shame, pride and above all, supremely above all, how overpowered it was by love. My eyes fill with tears just to think of you. Of me. Tears splash on to my keyboard now. I am perhaps happier now than I have ever been and yet I cannot but recognise that I would trade all that I am to be you, the eternally unhappy, nervous, wild, wondering and despairing 16-year-old Stephen: angry, angst-ridden and awkward but alive. Because you know how to feel, and knowing how to feel is more important than how you feel. Deadness of soul is the only unpardonable crime, and if there is one thing happiness can do it is mask deadness of soul.

I finally know now, as I easily knew then, that the most important thing is love. It doesn’t matter in the slightest whether that love is for someone of your own sex or not. Gay issues are important and I shall come to them in a moment, but they shrivel like a salted snail when compared to the towering question of love. Gay people sometimes believe (to this very day, would you credit it, young Stephen?) that the preponderance of obstacles and terrors they encounter in their lives and relationships is intimately connected with the fact of their being gay. As it happens at least 90% of their problems are to do with love and love alone: the lack of it, the denial of it, the inequality of it, the missed reciprocity in it, the horrors and heartaches of it. Love cold, love hot, love fresh, love stale, love scorned, love missed, love denied, love betrayed … the great joke of sexuality is that these problems bedevil straight people just as much as gay. The 10% of extra suffering and complexity that uniquely confronts the gay person is certainly not incidental or trifling, but it must be understood that love comes first. This is tough for straight people to work out.

Straight people are encouraged by culture and society to believe that their sexual impulses are the norm, and therefore when their affairs of the heart and loins go wrong (as they certainly will), when they are flummoxed, distraught and defeated by love, they are forced to believe that it must be their fault. We gay people at least have the advantage of being brought up to expect the world of love to be imponderably and unmanageably difficult, for we are perverted freaks and sick aberrations of nature. They – poor normal lambs – naturally find it harder to understand why, in Lysander’s words, “the course of true love never did run smooth”.

Sexual availability, so long an impossible dream in your age, becomes the norm in the late 70s and early 80s, only to be shattered by a new disease whose horrors you cannot even imagine. You would little believe that I can say to you now across the gap of 35 years that we are the blessed ones. The people of Britain are happy (or not) because of Tolpuddle Martyrs, Chartists, infantry regiments, any number of ancestors who made the world more comfortable for them. And we, gay people, are happy now (or not) in large part thanks to Stonewall rioters, Harvey Milk, Dennis Lemon, Gay News, Ian McKellen, Edwina Currie (true) et al, and the battered bodies of bullied, beaten and abused gay men and women who stood up to be counted and refused to apologise for the way they were. It has given us something we never thought to have: pride. For a thousand years, shame was our lot and now, turning on a sixpence, we have arrived at pride – without even, it seems, an intervening period of well-it’s-OK-I-suppose-wouldn’t-have-chosen-it-but-there-you-go. Who’da thought it?

I know what you are doing now, young Stephen. It’s early 1973. You are in the library, cross-referencing bibliographies so that you can find more and more examples of queer people in history, art and literature against whom you can hope to validate yourself. Leonardo, Tchaikovsky, Wilde, Barons Corvo and von Gloeden, Robin Maugham, Worsley, “an Englishman”, Jean Genet, Cavafy, Montherlant, Roger Peyrefitte, Mary Renault, Michael Campbell, Michael Davies, Angus Stewart, Gore Vidal, John Rechy, William Burroughs.

So many great spirits really do confirm that hope! It emboldens you to know that such a number of brilliant (if often doomed) souls shared the same impulse and desires as you. I know the index-card waltz of (auto)biographies, poems and novels you are dancing: those same names are still so close to the surface of my mind nearly four decades later. Novels, poetry and the worlds of art and ideas are opening up in front of you almost incidentally. You spend all your time in the library yearning to be told that you are not alone, and an unlooked for side-effect of this just happens to be a real education achieved in a private school designed for philistine bumpkins. Being born queer has given you, by mistake, a fantastic advantage over the rugger-playing ordinaries who surround you. But those rugger-playing ordinaries have souls too. And you should know that. I know you cannot believe it now. They seem so secure, so assured, so blessedly normal. They gave Cuthbert Worsley the Kipling-derived title of his overwhelmingly important (to you) autobiography The Flannelled Fool: “these are the men that have lost their soul/ The flannelled fool at he wicket/ And the muddied oaf at the goal”.

You look down at the fools almost as much as you fear them. The ordinary people, whose path through life is guaranteed. They won’t have to spend their days in public libraries, public lavatories and public courts ashamed, spurned and reviled. There is no internet. No Gay News. No gay chatlines. No men-seeking-men personals. No out-and-proud celebs. Just a world of shame and secrecy.

Somehow, as you age, a miracle will be wrought. You will begin by descending deeper into the depths: expulsion, crime and prison – nothing really to do with being gay, but everything to do with love and your inability to cope with it. Yet you will, as the Regency rakes used to say, “make a recover” and find yourself at university, where it will be astonishingly easy to be open about your sexuality. No great trick, for the university is Cambridge, long a hotbed of righteous tolerance, spiritual heavy-petting and homo hysteria. You will emerge from Cambridge and enter a world where being “out” is no big deal, although a puzzlingly small number of your coevals will find it as easy as you to emerge from the shadows. Before you damn anyone for failing to come out, look to their parents. The answer almost always lies there. Oh how lucky in that department, as in so many, you are, young Stephen.

But don’t kid yourself. For millions of teenagers around Britain and everywhere else, it is still 1973. Taunts, beatings and punishment await gay people the world over in playgrounds and execution grounds (the distance between which is measured by nothing more than political constitutions and human will). Yes, you will grow to be a very, very, very, very lucky man who is able to express his nature out loud without fear of hatred or reprisal from any except the most deluded, demented and sad. But that is a small battle won. A whole theatre of war remains. This theatre of war is bigger than the simple issue of being gay, just as the question of love swamps the question of mere sexuality. For alongside sexual politics the entire achievement of the enlightenment (which led inter alia to gay liberation) is under threat like never before. The cruel, hypocritical and loveless hand of religion and absolutism has fallen on the world once more.

So my message from the future is twofold. Fear not, young Stephen, your life will unfold in richer, more accepted and happier ways than you ever dared hope. But be wary, for the most basic tenets of rationalism, openness and freedom that nourish you now and seem so unassailable are about to be harried and besieged by malevolent, mad and medieval minds.

You poor dear, dear thing. Look at you weltering in your misery. The extraordinary truth is that you want to stay there. Unlike so many of the young, you do not yearn for adulthood, pubs and car keys. You want to stay where you are, in the Republic of Pubescence, where feeling has primacy and pain is beautiful. And you know what … ?

I think you are right.

• This is an edited version of an article from the 25th-birthday edition of Gay Times, out now. For more details, go to gaytimes.co.uk

bookmark_bordermy interpretation

最近在读Brave New World Revisited。每天看一篇多一点点,看完记一点点@@
不过想把今天这段贴到这里来希望有更多人看到=v=

第三篇Over-organization……
前两篇讲到人口过剩会导致极权zf。极权当然是不好的,本来以为这篇over-organization不会有什么新的东西。没想到!!!!

一开始讲的是,科技使得很大的权力掌握在一小撮人手中成为可能的事情。这似乎是极权的另一条路(而不光是人口过剩)。这一点我很同意。(啊我觉得读书最有感触的时候,是这本书confirm了我心中一些模糊的点。)

然后说,在under developed的国家里,极权很可能表现得很明显。但是在西方发达国家里,则表现为少数人有很大的影响力,他们控制别人的方法也很subtle,是manipulate而不是用武力来force。

美国的founding fathers之一的thomas Jefferson的理想国是由一个个self governing的个体组成的。(这个目标到底是不是一个高尚的目标呢?)但是如今的世界,never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. 读到这里我放下书倒抽一口气。

后面立刻还有更让我惊讶的!
作者立刻就开始考察这种世界里的人。他说,心理健康的重要表现是,有很多不适应的痛苦症状。为什么呢?
Where there are symptoms there is conflict, and conflict always indicates that the forces o life which strive for integration and happiness are still fighting.

因为这不是一本谈论个人幸福的书,不是self-help类型的书,所以读到这段非常惊讶。继而是感动。我几乎要流泪了。

bookmark_border2010娱乐盘点

今年上半年,我记录看片的excel文件损坏。我回顾了的IMDb投票记录(还好这个列表默认按照投票时间排序,而毫无疑问今年看的第一部是DW的谢幕篇End of Time),和我自己的看片Log,(以后就记录在那里吧)。以下从今年新看过的电影里选出(今年看的电影比较少。。。):

最佳电影/剧集:
Cemetery Junction

今年看的电影中,无疑这部Cemetery Junction最贴近我的内心。
候选:
Doctor Who: Vincent and the Doctor
The Jane Austen Book Club
Alice (2009)
Doctor Who: The End of Time

最佳女演员:
Kate Hudson – Almost Famous
导演说她是free spirit……
候选:
Carey Mulligan – An Education
Kate Winslet – Revolutionary Road
Felicity Jones – Cemetery Junction, Northanger Abbey

最佳男演员:Matt Smith – Doctor Who
候选:
Colin Morgan – Merlin
Leonardo DiCaprio – Revolutionary Road
Ben Whishaw – Brideshead Revisited

Sexiest Woman: Carey Mulligan – An Education, Northanger Abbey
候选:
Kate Hudson – Almost Famous
Karen Gillian – Doctor Who
Rachel Hurd-Wood – Perfume, Dorian Gray
Emma Watson – Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Talulah Riley – The Boat that Rocked
Hayley Atwell – Brideshead Revisited
Chloe Moretz – Kick-Ass

Sexiest Man: Mika

选这张照片,因为你看那眼神!
候选:
Matt Bellamy
Matt Smith – Doctor Who
Tom Hughes – Cemetery Junction
Ben Whishaw – Brideshead Revisited, Bright Star, Perfume
Colin Morgan – Merlin
Eoin Macken – Merlin (Gwaine)
J. J. Field – Northanger Abbey
Rupert Penry-Jones – Persuasion
Aaron Johnson – Kick-Ass
Benedict Cumberbatch – Sherlock

bookmark_border27

我对自己是不是聪明有很深刻的怀疑。我不想承认自己不聪明,所以总是在寻找相反的证据。但是我也不能忽略我不聪明的论据。看看我父母就知道,我应该不是很聪明。小时候我算术成绩非常差。任何那种看谁聪明先回答的事情都轮不上我。

作为不是很聪明的人,我觉得(并且希望不是因为我这样希望才这样觉得)人聪明与否不仅和天生的智力有关,更和后天的习惯有关。一个审时度势的人可以顾及到很多方面,也许没有聪明的人那样聪明,但是可以知道得更多。而没有全局观的人,则可以保持humble。相反,很多聪明的人,喜欢停留在他们熟悉的领域里,maintain他们聪明的声誉,反而不利于他们。

以前要我承认自己不聪明,并且得到上述结论,是很难的。我觉得现在的转变的原因是,我对自己越来越接受了,所以不需要依靠别人来说我聪明。

=====
一个公司的实质,其实只是使一大堆人一起来做一件事。什么领导决策啊、项目流程啊、管理方法啊,都是围绕着“一大堆人一起来做一件事”的。我们从小被学校教育要认真听话,造成了现在无法透过公司的规定、同事的眼光、上级的旨意来明白本质的事情。

但是为什么总是只有商业、经济利益才能驱使一大堆人做一件事呢?商业在如今的社会的力量真是太强了。

bookmark_border耳机的一些唠叨

一直以为自己不会鉴别音质,在买我的PX100之前,在网上读到评论说它的音质好我都没有在意。我的耳朵好像不适应大多数耳塞式耳机,选择买PX100是因为看中它可折叠的设计。买来后我也没有好好用,经常任它的线胡乱卷着。前一个星期天接口处的线忽然断了!失去了才知道珍贵,我过了1.5个没有PX100的星期。起先,我想用我的iPod原装耳机替代。原装耳机的形状非常不适合我的耳朵,不管我怎么塞它都很容易掉下来。而且我惊奇地发现,经过PX100的熏陶,我对音质居然有了要求,明显觉得原装耳机对某些音色的表现力很不够。

可是森海塞尔在上海没有维修点。纠结了一星期,我还是决定让做电工的老爸给焊一下。(之前觉得在保修期内,最好还是请专业修耳机的人来修,我也不知自己焊线会不会对音质有影响。所以就没有交给老爸。)今天爸爸回家来,不仅带着修好的耳机,还带着他同事的一副巨大的魔声Beats Studio耳机(注:我没有搞清楚这幅耳机是不是正版的)。我从来没有用过这么强大的耳机,迫不及待地戴起来试听。这耳机一罩在耳朵上,就几乎听不见外面的声音了,音乐响起来之后就可以完全沉浸在音乐中了。(我天天戴着PX100走在喧嚣的大街上的时候,有时候几乎完全听不见耳机内的声音)不过我还是发现,这幅强大的耳机音质没有我小巧的PX100好。虽然它隔绝了外部的声音,但是在安静环境下还是PX100的效果更真实。我开始有点理解网上对于PX100的评论,说它的低音效果好了。

PX100第一代目前已经停产了,当时我买的价格是260(黑色,白色的要贵一些),而现在的PX100第二代似乎很贵,新蛋上白色的要580。

虽然现在上班不能听音乐了,但是终于可以把Mika亲切的声音、巴赫的钢琴曲、巴赫的声乐曲、各种准备听的巴赫、各种电影音乐、各种流行音乐,和各种audio book带在身边了!

bookmark_borderMatt!!

好久没有更新,趁着马特生日,我也来写个表白贴!

马特已经取代了9和10成为我最喜欢的Doctor了!我很高兴他来演我最爱的Doctor Who。我觉得爱上了他,我自己的言行也变得比以前可爱了(有这样说自己的么)。看到他的笑容我的心里就一亮。他虽然长得没有DT好看,但是混搭穿衣太让人眼馋了。虽然他深沉起来没有CE有力,但是他的个人作风的那种亲和力,和DT相比有过之而无不及啊!!还有我最最最喜欢的一点是,他为什么可以笑起来的时候嘴角和眼角都充满了笑容呢???嗯是的,虽然每个Doctor都不一样,但是我最喜欢11。

Gotcha!!

bookmark_border老版Doctor Who、聚会、SFX

我是2006年的时候开始看Doctor Who的,当时完全没有想到喜爱Doctor Who会有那么多回报。

这次聚会我带回了的物质收获之一,是借来了几盘老版DW的碟。(让我自己主动去下,那么庞大的系列我望而生畏,挑选着下也不知该选啥,所以有碟借就省心好多^^另外,借我碟的DM同学,实在是收碟帝啊啊!我望着自己的DVD收藏,忽然不觉得自己很奢侈了。)就这样我看了五部老DW故事,其中三个Tom Baker,一个是Jon Pertwee,还有一部是The Five Doctors,当时的“现任”Doctor是Peter Davison。这些DVD大部分都是2005年以后制作的。这几个故事中,The Five Doctors是庆祝性质居多,故事其实写得有点勉强(因为这样的一个制作是很庞大的,不能完全靠作者的才智);The Talons of Wen-Chiang故事很单薄,我不太喜欢之外,另外三个的写作水平都很高。总体的视觉效果和故事节奏在现在的眼光来看是很差的,这一点在粉丝的眼里很可以容忍。甚至就因为Doctor Who以前是那样的,一步一步走来,看到它的变化,它不断regenerate,让对它有感情的粉丝更加感触。

我看了City of Death的花絮,当然是因为它的作者是Douglas Adams。花絮中收录了两段分别是1985年和1992年对DNA的采访。City of Death是Doctor Who第一个在国外取景的故事,当时他们来到了巴黎。故事和卢浮宫里的Mona Lisa有关。整个故事一个玄机套着一个玄机,在当时的标准来看一定是个很复杂的故事。故事的结尾非常像Dirk Gently。另外还充斥着好玩的对话,这些对话一看就让人觉得带有DNA的风格。比如Doctor被坏人Count夫妇抓住后,两人在议论他:

Countess: I don’t think he is as stupid as he looks.
Count: Nobody is as stupid as he looks.

DVD花絮中讨论了很多当时的情况,大家都讨论了很多DNA。花絮的最后是一段Steven Moffat说,如果DNA还活着的话,他觉得RTD肯定起码会邀请他来写一个剧本。He has to ask. And I hope he would do it.

另外一个我也很喜欢的故事是Inferno。极权世界在西方和科幻是连在一起的。我很喜欢这两个平行世界的设计。The Genesis of the Daleks里,原来Doctor遇到能毁灭Dalek的时候的道德辩论,并不是2005版的发明。

还很让我感触的,是The Five Doctors的花絮。这五个Doctor,每个人性格都不太一样。片中Tom Baker出现的地方,正是在剑桥的小河里划船,看片的时候我小小的激动了一把。花絮中得知当时Tom Baker拒绝了出演,这些片段是未播出的Shada的镜头,于是这也是DNA写的啊!采访中各个演员、导演、作者和周边人员都对4th表示理解。Peter Davison说,当时编导们想了一些办法来照顾每个Doctor的演员的ego,这一点他想来觉得有点shame,其实完全不必要。我觉得Peter Davison和David Tennant是一个风格的啊!他们都是超级大好人。1983年他们组织了一个庆祝活动,当时主办方大大低估了会来参加的人数,造成很多人排着长队但是没有希望进来。Peter Davison本人非常好心地花了一个半小时亲自走到队伍里,从头到尾走了一下慰问来晚了的粉丝们。David Tennant离开的时候曾经说,他很骄傲能成为这个长系列的一部分,并且觉得,正是因为不断更新,不断拥抱新的演员,新的作者,新的一切人,Doctor Who才一直走下来,被更多的人喜爱。他对自己的离开的理解,让我觉得非常感动。我忽然想到了,对Doctor Who的喜爱,有那么多回报是超出这个剧本身的。

如今Science fiction已经成为popular culture的很重要一部分。但是即使是在1983年,粉丝聚会、fan magazine之类的就已经兴盛。有很多现在的DW作者就是粉丝出身,Paul Cornell,更不要说现在的Steven Moffat。看了1983年庆祝的录像,我得出结论聚会乃是粉丝的本性啊!

===聚会分界线===

虽然我本人是这次聚会的积极分子,但是由于我不善交流,没有生活经验、还比较没脑子,幸好有飞翔的前版主粉蒸肉姐姐的大力支持,还有Yuki姐姐来上海的借口,我们第一次组织聚会就来了十多人。我先见到的是Dario同学,看上去很smart,粉蒸肉是看上去很让人信赖的姐姐,还有看上去很学生气的Susanna和Leah。小T同学比我想像的娇小很多,本来由于她弹Muse很精彩,我对她的印象是很高大的^^b折雨姐姐很惊艳,我们中要谁cos Amy的话就是她了!Yuki姐姐果然有点让人惊讶。她一来就像圣诞老人一样发礼物!

吃饭过后我们去了桌游店,在三位会玩的朋友的指导下我们玩起了三国杀,这里辛苦Yann啦。可惜我刚有点学会了觉得有劲头的时候,几位朋友陆续离开,我们人数不够不得不玩起了一个猜图画的游戏。这里大家非常有想象力(主要是小T同学),通过各种方式扯到DW上,看起来比三国杀更像是DW聚会该玩的游戏^^

回家后我还可以花好几个小时享受SFX 200期!我一直不知道SFX三个字母是啥的缩写。这一期有第一任主编的一篇文章,告诉我们SFX中的X代表excitement,不过选这个组合也有目的是让人误以为是另一个单词……(Shane同学曾经看错过^^b)

=======下面是节选摘抄SFX 200期的两个内容:

15年的世界:
奥斯卡奖获得者
1995年:最佳影片Braveheart,最近啊导演Mel Gibson,最佳男演员Nicholas Cage,最佳女演员Susan Sarandon
2010年:最佳影片The Hurt Locker,最近啊导演Kathryn Bigelow,最佳男演员Jeff Bridges,最佳女演员Sandra Bullock

世界杯冠军
1995年:巴西
2010年:西班牙

英国首相
1995年:John Major
2010年:David Cameron

排行榜冠军专辑
1995年:Oasis: What’s The Story Morning Glory?
2010年:Lady Gaga: The Fame

最高盈利电影
1995年:Die Heart With A Vengeance
2010年:Alice In Wonderland

一期SFX的页数
1995年:108
2010年:148

星战电影数量
1995年:3
2010年:7

星际迷航电影数量
1995年:7
2010年:11

Joss Whedon被砍电视剧数量
1995年:0
2010年:4

另一个SFX专题:假设在一个平行宇宙里没有Star Wars?

没有SW,就没有现在的George Lucas
就没有Howard鸭子
Harrison Ford就不能成为大明星
没有Indiana Jones系列
–没有Indiana Jones系列就没有盗宝电影:古墓丽影, 木乃伊归来等等

没有SW,电影的视觉效果方面:
没有ILM
–没有ILM就没有Lord of the Rings,因为没有抓人动作的技术拍Gollum
没有侏罗纪公园
没有泰坦尼克,没有阿凡达(James Cameron曾经说过是星战激发他开始拍电影的)
没有Pixar(Pixar原本是ILM的一部分)
–没有Pixar就没有Warll-E等等……

没有SW就没有现在的周边圈钱术^^

没有星战对星际迷航的影响?
没有TNG
–没有TNG就没有现在的space opera电视剧:巴比伦五号、Stargate SG1等等

没有星战就没有Alien系列(Ridley Scott又是一个被星战激发的导演)
没有Alien就没有一系列强势科幻女主角:Buffy, Lara Croft, Sarah Connor等等

没有星战,SF不可能像现在这样兴盛
也许就没有SFX

没有星战,也许我不会去看Doctor Who……^^

bookmark_border今天出门

外文书店现在越来越能满足我了。

接到薰的消息,去买了一本原版的梵高画册,觉得好超值。

在四楼看到了他们收齐了CS Lewis的基督教的书。(嗯,我这里有本中文版的Mere Christianity还没看完)


下面这张图是几个月之前拍的。外文书店进了这套新的H2G2,并且放在了“罗素角”里^^b这个角落当然就是我最喜欢的角落了。

一楼的畅销书区域,看到一本书封面上仅有“curiouser and curiouser”字样,书页的侧面都是黑色的!这是一本爱丽丝漫游奇境记^^好可爱的书哦哦……

下面这本ST的小说,居然是William Shatner写的?

最后一幅图是我家的楼的电梯里的雷人广告——买大闸蟹满2万元赠送盖满印章的世博护照……

在外文书店看到了……卓越上没有的wordsworth classics的Emma和Persuasion……